How to calculate a non-bank lender's leverage ratio, and the levels Mexican lenders run at

Average liabilities less repo borrowing, over average equity: the formula a Mexican rating agency applies, reconciled to its balance sheet, the level by segment, and the capitalisation at which named lenders' ratings would move.

19 October 20266 min read
Capital2.2xleverage of 84 rated Mexican lenders

A lender's leverage ratio is its liabilities divided by its equity. The Mexican rating agency HR Ratings averages both over twelve months and takes out repo borrowing first. On that basis the 84 institutions in its non-bank sector sample ran at 2.2 times in June 2026, from 1.9 times in payroll lending to 2.9 times in agricultural finance.

The rating agency's leverage ratio averages a year and takes out repo borrowing

The formula sits in the glossary of every HR Ratings report on a lender. In its report on Crediclub of 11 June 2026 it reads: «Razón de Apalancamiento Ajustada. Pasivo Total Prom. 12m - Saldos Acreedor en Operaciones de Reporto Prom. 12m / Capital Contable Prom. 12m». In English: average total liabilities over the last twelve months, minus the average balance owed under repurchase agreements, divided by average shareholders' equity.

Three choices are built into it. The ratio counts every liability, not only debt that bears interest. It uses twelve-month averages, so a lender that grew fast in the last quarter reads lower than its balance sheet on the last day. And it removes repos, money raised by selling securities the lender holds with an agreement to buy them back, which funds the treasury rather than the loan book. The agency's sector report of 25 August 2026 prints a shorter form, average liabilities over average equity, and so does its 2023 report on Mexican banks. The longer form is the one that reproduces the published number.

One balance sheet gives 2.53 times at the quarter end and 2.2 times as the agency measures it

HR Ratings, NBFIs Sector Analysis, 25 August 2026: consolidated balance sheet of 84 rated institutions at 2Q25 and 2Q26 (liabilities, repurchase agreements, equity, current portfolio, net debt) and published ratios at 2Q26. Each step is our computation from those lines; the agency does not say how many points enter its twelve-month average, and two quarter ends are used here.

StepComputationResultPrinted by HR Ratings
Liabilities over equity, June 2026264,363 ÷ 104,4012.53 timesnot printed
Less repo borrowing, June 2026(264,363 − 37,364) ÷ 104,4012.17 timesnot printed
Less repo borrowing, averaged over the year(247,800 − 32,274) ÷ 98,4182.19 times2.2 times
Current portfolio over net debt, June 2026292,603 ÷ 154,9851.89 times1.9 times

Removing repos and averaging reproduce the printed 2.2 times. A lender that quotes its own leverage from the last balance sheet can read about 15% above the agency's figure, so quote the agency's version and say which one it is.

Repos are 37,364 of the sector's 264,363 in liabilities at June 2026, about 14%, so the adjustment is not a rounding detail. The figures are in millions of the lenders' reporting currency. One ratio in the same report does not reconcile from the printed lines: equity over securities plus the net loan book gives 33.6%, against a published capitalisation of 31.9%, because the agency's base of assets subject to risk is not itemised in full.

Two companion ratios are read with leverage, and the rating moves on capitalisation

HR Ratings reports leverage beside two other ratios, defined in the same glossary. The capitalisation index is equity over assets subject to risk, that is, securities plus the net loan book. Current portfolio to net debt is performing loans over debt that bears interest, less cash and securities. When almost all assets carry risk the first one is a mirror of leverage: a capitalisation of 31.9% implies liabilities of about 2.1 times equity.

SME lenders run the most leverage and the thinnest equity; agricultural lenders have the least loan book behind their debt

HR Ratings, NBFIs Sector Analysis, 25 August 2026: audited quarterly data of 84 rated institutions, 63 of them non-bank financial institutions; segment tables at 2Q26 with the number of institutions in each segment. Adjusted leverage, capitalisation index and current portfolio to net debt as defined in the agency's glossary.

Segment, rated institutionsAdjusted leverageCapitalisation indexCurrent portfolio to net debt
Agricultural finance, 252.9 times28.7%1.3 times
SME lending, 272.8 times22.6%2.0 times
Microfinance, 221.9 times35.0%2.2 times
Payroll lending, 101.9 times37.4%2.0 times
All 84 rated institutions2.2 times31.9%1.9 times

The sector average of 2.2 times hides a spread of one full turn of equity. A lender is compared with its own segment: an SME book at 2.8 times sits at its segment's average, not above it.

The level has barely moved in three years. Adjusted leverage for the whole sample was 2.1 times at the end of 2023, 2024 and 2025, and 2.2 times at June 2026. SME lenders came down from 3.3 times to 2.8 over the same period, while payroll lenders rose from 1.5 to 1.9.

Rating reports name the capitalisation at which a lender's grade would move

Each HR Ratings report on a lender closes with the factors that could raise or lower the rating, and for solvency the agency names a capitalisation index, not a leverage multiple. Consol Negocios is an unregulated SOFOM, the Mexican licence for a non-bank lender (sociedad financiera de objeto múltiple). HR Ratings would downgrade it at «29.5% o inferiores de manera sostenida»; its capitalisation stood at 32.8%. Its report explains the fall from 36.7% a year earlier by «el crecimiento de 27.2% en la cartera de crédito»: the book grew faster than the equity behind it.

The downgrade line sits 3 to 17 points of capitalisation below where each rated lender stands

HR Ratings rating reports: Consol Negocios, S.A. de C.V., SOFOM, E.N.R., 3 June 2026 (figures at 1Q26); Grupo CAPEM (Grupo Olinx, S.A.P.I. de C.V., SOFOM, E.N.R.), 9 March 2026 (4Q25); Crediclub, S.A. de C.V., Sociedad Financiera Popular, 11 June 2026 (1Q26); Sofoplus, S.A.P.I. de C.V., SOFOM, E.R., short-term programme, 8 December 2025 (3Q25). Thresholds are the agency's «Factores que podrían subir / bajar la calificación», sustained levels.

Lender and ratingCapitalisationAdjusted leveragePortfolio to net debtRating moves if capitalisation
Consol Negocios, SOFOM E.N.R., HR BBB+32.8%2.2 times1.4 timesup at 36.7% or more; down at 29.5% or less
Grupo CAPEM, SOFOM E.N.R., HR BBB27.9%3.1 times1.3 timesup above 35.0%; down below 24.0%
Crediclub, sofipo, HR A+36.9%2.1 times1.5 timesup above 40.0%; down below 20.0%
Sofoplus, SOFOM E.R., short-term programme HR129.3%2.4 times1.5 timesnot stated

Crediclub stood at 4.3 times and 12.9% at March 2024, before a capital injection at the end of 2024. A first credit line drawn in full can move a lender by more than the distance to its downgrade line, so the ratios after the draw are what to model.

2.2x

adjusted leverage of the 84 institutions in HR Ratings' non-bank sample, June 2026

Average liabilities less repo borrowing, over average equity, twelve months.

A first credit line moves all three ratios in one draw

A worked example, modelled. A lender holds loans of 90 and cash of 10, funded by equity of 40 and debt of 60, with no other liabilities. Its leverage is 1.5 times, below every segment in the table above, its capitalisation 44.4% and its portfolio to net debt 1.8 times. It then draws a first line of 40 and lends that and its cash. Loans are now 140, debt 100 and equity still 40: leverage 2.5 times, capitalisation 28.6%, portfolio to net debt 1.4 times.

One draw takes the lender from below the least levered segments to above the sector average of 2.2 times, and its capitalisation to below Consol Negocios' downgrade line. Warehouse lines filed with the SEC test it as well: On Deck's Form 8-K of 8 August 2018 lists a «maximum leverage ratio» among the financial covenants of its ODAF II facility. The same arithmetic is tested twice, by the agency and by the lenders.

No statute caps leverage for an unregulated SOFOM

Banco de México's Financial Stability Report of June 2026 lists who must hold a minimum. «La Banca Múltiple, las Sofomes reguladas vinculadas patrimonialmente con instituciones de Banca Múltiple o Grupos Financieros y las Uniones de Crédito deben mantener un nivel de ICAP mínimo superior al 8%», and sofipos and socaps keep net capital at 100% of their requirement. The unregulated SOFOM is in neither list. Its ceiling is set by the rating agency and by its creditors.

The regulatory ICAP is not the agency's capitalisation index. ICAP divides net capital by risk-weighted assets; HR Ratings divides book equity by unweighted assets subject to risk. The two percentages are not comparable, and a bank-style 8% says nothing about where a SOFOM's rating would move.

Sector, segment and lender figures are HR Ratings' published figures; the reconciliation and the worked example are our computation from them.

Questions this raises

How do you calculate a lender's leverage ratio?
Divide total liabilities by shareholders' equity. HR Ratings, which rates Mexican non-bank lenders, uses twelve-month averages of both and subtracts balances owed under repurchase agreements from liabilities first. On that basis its 84 rated institutions stood at 2.2 times in June 2026.
What is a normal leverage ratio for a non-bank lender in Mexico?
In HR Ratings' sample of 84 rated institutions, adjusted leverage was 2.2 times at June 2026: 1.9 times in payroll lending and microfinance, 2.8 times in SME lending and 2.9 times in agricultural finance. The sample has stayed between 2.1 and 2.2 times since the end of 2023.
What is the difference between the leverage ratio and the capitalisation index?
Leverage is liabilities over equity. HR Ratings' capitalisation index is equity over assets subject to risk, meaning securities plus the net loan book. When nearly all assets carry risk, one mirrors the other: a capitalisation of 31.9% implies liabilities of about 2.1 times equity.
Does an unregulated SOFOM have a minimum capital ratio?
No statutory minimum applies. Banco de México's June 2026 Financial Stability Report lists the 8% ICAP minimum for banks, regulated SOFOMs tied to a bank and credit unions, and a 100% capital requirement for sofipos and socaps. The ceiling for an unregulated SOFOM comes from its rating agency and its creditors.
How does a first credit line change a lender's leverage?
Debt rises and equity does not. In a modelled lender with loans of 90, cash of 10, equity of 40 and debt of 60, drawing a line of 40 and lending it with the cash takes leverage from 1.5 to 2.5 times and capitalisation from 44.4% to 28.6%.
Where every figure on this page comes from8 sources
  • 01HR Ratings, NBFIs Sector Analysis, 25 August 2026: sample of 84 rated institutions, glossary (adjusted leverage ratio, capitalisation index, current portfolio to net debt, net debt), sector and segment tables at 2Q26 and the consolidated balance sheet.
  • 02HR Ratings, rating report on Crediclub, S.A. de C.V., Sociedad Financiera Popular, 11 June 2026: glossary definition of the adjusted leverage ratio, solvency at 1Q24, 1Q25 and 1Q26, factors that could raise or lower the rating.
  • 03HR Ratings, rating report on Consol Negocios, S.A. de C.V., SOFOM, E.N.R., 3 June 2026: solvency at 1Q26 and factors that could raise or lower the rating.
  • 04HR Ratings, rating announcement on Grupo CAPEM (Grupo Olinx, S.A.P.I. de C.V., SOFOM, E.N.R.), 9 March 2026: solvency at 4Q25 and factors that could raise or lower the rating.
  • 05HR Ratings, rating announcement on the 2025 short-term certificate programme of Sofoplus, S.A.P.I. de C.V., SOFOM, E.R., 8 December 2025: solvency at 3Q25.
  • 06HR Ratings, Banca Múltiple en México, Análisis Sectorial, 10 March 2023: glossary definition of the adjusted leverage ratio.
  • 07On Deck Capital, Form 8-K filed with the SEC for 8 August 2018: ODAF II asset-backed revolving facility and its covenants, including maximum leverage.
  • 08Banco de México, Reporte de Estabilidad Financiera, June 2026: Gráfica 145 and its notes on minimum capitalisation by type of institution.
Capital3.75%floor under a three-year pool's margin

How to calculate excess spread on a loan pool, and the floor a credit line sets under it

Cash collected, minus every senior fee and the line's own interest, over the loans that still pay, times 12: the definition in two filed credit lines, the floor by loan term, and the margin Mexican non-bank books leave.

Read it
Risk72monthsbefore a bureau deletes a default

What a Mexican lender reports to the credit bureau, and how it proves it every month

Buró de Crédito and Círculo de Crédito, the duty to report every loan with two dates, the bureau document filed with CONDUSEF monthly, and how long a default stays on file.

Read it
Risk57.9%CAT of a 46.6% rate before any fee

What the CAT (costo anual total) is, and what it leaves out of a Mexican lender's price

Banco de México's compounded, all-in annual cost of a loan: what Circular 21/2009 counts, why VAT, late fees and default stay out, and how a fund rebuilds the advertised CAT from the loan tape.

Read it
Capital1.30xcollateral behind each unit of debt

What a fideicomiso is in Mexican lender financing, and the advance it carries

How a Mexican trust holds a lender's loans for the fund that financed them, and the aforo four deals with published terms required: 1.27x to 1.30x, an advance near 77% to 79%.

Read it
Risk90days late moves an instalment loan

What cartera vencida means for a Mexican lender

The CNBV day counts that move a Mexican loan into cartera vencida, why banks call it etapa 3 since 2022, and why an unregulated SOFOM's number needs its own rule checked.

Read it
Capital1.0xwhen a cohort has paid back what it was lent

How to measure collections from a loan tape

Cash a cohort has paid back, divided by the principal it was lent, read by months since origination. Why collection efficiency answers a different question, and the three tape mistakes a fund checks for.

Read it
Capital5yearsof cohorts the SEC and agencies ask for

What a static pool is

A cohort of loans from one period, measured against its own original principal for life. Why the denominator is the point, what the SEC and the Mexican agencies ask for, and how an agency turns it into one rate.

Read it
Capital69fieldsin one template. 24 wins a term sheet

What a loan tape is

One row per loan at a stated cut-off date. What the file has to carry, how the fields change by asset class, and why a tape without a data dictionary cannot be checked.

Read it
Capital28itemsbefore a first institutional facility

The 28 items in a fund's first request

Eight lettered blocks and 28 numbered items, in the order a fund's own analyst files the answers, and 8 of them ask only that you reconcile your own documents against each other.

Read it
Risk4documentsbetween one audit and the next

How an investor watches a book it does not own

Four signed artefacts on a contractual cadence, recomputed rather than read, with consequences tied to arithmetic. Monitoring from the seat that has no access.

Read it
Capital37questionsbefore anyone asks about yield

What a fund asks on the first call, and the order of everything after it

The loan tape before yield, then six gates a credit committee clears one at a time, 37 items in all, and which of them a connected loan tape closes without anyone typing.

Read it
Risk11monthsbetween two verified numbers

The eleven dark months

An audit reads a closed period once a year. What a fund prices is the gap between two audit dates, and that gap is where the failures this market remembers were found after the fact.

Read it
Mexico559lendersin one official count, not in the other

Mexico cannot count its own lenders

Two official counts of the same sector, 559 apart, and no published loan book behind either. Who lends to Mexican small businesses, on whose money, and where the money stops.

Read it
Talk to us

Book a demo.

Tell us how you lend and what the capital is for. We will show you the platform on your own numbers and give you an honest read.

A founder reads it and answers within one business day, with a time that suits you.

  • ✓Thirty minutes, nothing prepared
  • ✓An honest read before you spend months on diligence
  • ✓We say no when the mandate does not fit

Still loading. The button switches on by itself and nothing you have typed is lost. If it never does, this browser has JavaScript turned off, and this form needs it.

One business day, and nothing to prepare.

By sending this form you agree to our Privacy Policy.